Darwin, Dover, 'Intelligent Design' and textbooks.
نویسندگان
چکیده
ID ('intelligent design') is not science, but a form of creationism; both are very different from the simple theological proposition that a divine Creator is responsible for the natural patterns and processes of the Universe. Its current version maintains that a 'Designer' must intervene miraculously to accomplish certain natural scientific events. The verdict in the 2005 case Kitzmiller, et al. v. Dover School District, et al. (in Harrisburg, PA, U.S.A.) was a landmark of American jurisprudence that prohibited the teaching of ID as science, identified it as religiously based, and forbade long-refuted 'criticisms of evolution' from introduction into public school classes. Much of the science of the trial was based on biochemistry; biochemists and other scientists have several important opportunities to improve scientific literacy and science education in American public schools ('state schools') by working with teachers, curriculum developers and textbook writers.
منابع مشابه
Designs on intelligence
An expected six-week court case, due to conclude next month, pits US biologists' commitment to the evolutionary theories of Darwin once again against religious opponents with more biblical views. In a Pennsylvania courtroom a test case could decide how evolution is taught in state schools. The civil trial, triggered last year by a classroom battle, marks the beginning of the first major legal a...
متن کاملHuman Evolution from Darwin to Dover: What a Long Strange Trip It’s Been
These lyrics, sung by Crystal and Robyn Bernard for Dr. Jerry Falwell: Feudin’ Fussin’ & Frettin’, capture one of the more significant challenges to teaching human evolution: the belief that “I didn’t come from a monkey.” A documentary on the Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District trial, over the teaching of intelligent design, also features this song, and not surprisingly, it was also in Dov...
متن کاملSwift-boating Darwin: alternative or complementary science.
American scientists breathed a collective sigh of relief last December after Judge John Jones ruled against teaching intelligent design (ID) in the classrooms of science. “The overwhelming evidence is that Intelligent Design is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism and not a scientific theory,” Jones declared in his 139-page decision, issued in Dover, PA. “It is an extension of th...
متن کاملGrowing challenge of Darwin's detractors
Evolutionary biologists in the US got a little early seasonal cheer in December with a detailed and comprehensive attack on the increasingly widespread notion of intelligent design. A Pennsylvania judge ruled that it could not be taught alongside Darwin’s theory of natural selection in biology classes. Dover Area School Board members violated the Constitution when they ordered that its biology ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Biochemical journal
دوره 417 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009